Quick fixes AG-P008

Make it argue the other side

Shared methods · A shared method; linked tool guides explain the exact steps.

A model agrees with your framing by default. Asking for the strongest case against is the cheapest second opinion you will ever get.

Quick fix: Make it argue the other side

Instead of Here's my plan — refine it.

Try Here's my plan. Before refining anything: give the strongest case against it, and the conditions under which it fails.

One extra sentence, asked before you commit rather than after.

Why this works

Models follow the asker's frame. Present a plan for refinement and you get refinement, including of ideas that deserved rejection. Asking for the counter-case flips the frame, and the shape of what comes back is informative even where you cannot judge the content: a solid position attracts a specific, narrow rebuttal; a shaky one gets vague hedging, because there is no real structure to attack. This works on your own drafts, the model's answers, and other people's proposals alike.

When this applies

Right before a decision hardens: sending the plan, signing off the design, accepting the recommendation. The critique is cheap now and expensive after.

Template

Steelman the case against [this]. Under what conditions does it fail? What would someone who disagrees say is my blind spot?

Go deeper

Reading rebuttal shape as a signal comes from verifying what you cannot judge. Note the failure mode in reverse: the model conceding when you push back is the same compliance, not new evidence.

Improve next

Last verified · Reviewed by Timothy Fehr