Quick fixes AG-P007

Ask for three options, not one answer

Shared methods · A shared method; linked tool guides explain the exact steps.

The first answer is one draw from a distribution, delivered with full confidence. Asking for alternatives shows you the spread before you commit.

Quick fix: Ask for three options, not one answer

Instead of What should we name the product? → take the first suggestion.

Try Give me three name directions with different flavours (one safe, one playful, one abstract), and say what each trades away.

For anything with taste or judgement in it, see options before choosing.

Why this works

The model does not hand you "the" answer; it hands you one sample from many it could have produced, wearing the confidence of a final verdict. For factual questions that is a verification problem. For open questions (names, designs, plans, framings) it silently narrows your choice to whatever came out first. Asking for deliberately different options (not three variations of one idea) turns the model into what it is actually good at here: cheap exploration. You stay the judge.

When this applies

Any decision you would normally sleep on, get a second opinion about, or sketch three versions of, done in one prompt and accepted in one reply.

Template

Give me [three] genuinely different options for [the thing]. Make them differ in [the dimension that matters: tone / approach / risk]. For each: one sentence on what it trades away.

Go deeper

Choosing between options is easier when the model also argues against its own favourite. The divergent-half framing — exploration is cheap, judgement stays yours — runs through the designers page, and applies far beyond design.

Improve next

Last verified · Reviewed by Timothy Fehr